Prepared as a Public
Service to the People by the Law
Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr.
In the recent New Jersey
Supreme Court case, State v. Hinton, the court ruled that when a tenant
is evicted or moves permanently from their apartment that the tenant no longer
has any reasonable expectation of privacy.
In this case Mr. Hinton was
legally removed from his apartment based on a warrant of removal. When the court officer arrived to change the
locks and do a safety inspection it was discovered that Mr. Hinton had left his
stash of heroin and cash in his bedroom.
Upon discovering this, the court officer notified the local police you
entered the apartment without a warrant.
Although the Appellate
Division suppressed the drugs, on the basis that the police violated the
defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy, the Supreme Court reversed
holding that the tenant no longer had this privacy right.
Although on its face this
case appears to be an innocuous decision limited to the facts; it appears,
however, that this case is of concern to the defense bar. This is the first case in many years which
refused to follow the automatic standing rule with all personal property.
Under Governor Christi’s
Supreme Court appointment, the court is becoming more conservative and a clear
shift in the slow evisceration of the constitutional protections previously
afforded defendants in this state.
Quote of the Day: “There
are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual
and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden
usurpations.” President James Madison
Elizabeth (Union County) New
Jersey
(908) 354-7006
NJ Criminal Defense
Attorney, Newark Criminal Attorneys, Elizabeth Criminal Attorneys, Hudson
County Criminal Attorneys, Middlesex County Criminal Lawyers, Ocean and Monmouth
Criminal Lawyers.
No comments:
Post a Comment