Showing posts with label bayonne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bayonne. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Choosing the Right Attorney to Handle Your Motor


Like anything else choosing the right attorney to handle your motor vehicle summons might make all the difference in the world.  Choosing an attorney with many years of experience might make the difference between a fantastic disposition of the motor vehicle charges as opposed to an adequate result.

Like all areas of the law the handling of motor vehicle summons in municipal court takes a level of experience and skill which is acquired over many years of practice. 
Attorney Sanzone has handled thousands of motor vehicle cases in his 26-years of practice and has achieved many very favorable dispositions.

Just last week for example Attorney Sanzone achieved the complete dismissal of a CDS in a motor vehicle charge and possession of CDS in municipal court, (Somerset County) after filing a motion to suppress evidence.  On the same day, in Hudson County, in other case municipal court achieved a complete dismissal of the charge of leaving the scene of the accident in which property damage was allegedly made.

In this time of attorney direct mailings it is important the client research carefully the attorney’s track record and years of experience before retaining an attorney to handle your motor vehicle case.  Like all decisions, choosing the attorney who has the lowest price might not be the smartest decision. 
Today, yes, even motor vehicle convictions can have adverse consequences on obtaining a good paying job, not to mention the collateral consequences of having a bad driving record. 

A criminal defense attorney in New Jersey who handles motor vehicle case in all cities and towns in New Jersey, including Bayonne, Jersey City, Kearny, and all other cities in Hudson County.

Elizabeth New Jersey Office, (908) 354-7006
Bayonne, New Jersey Office, (201) 240-5716

 

 

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Press Release Hudson County Superior Court, December of 2014.



Defendant charged and indicted by a Hudson County Grand Jury with official misconduct (second degree) and theft (third degree).  Defendant facing a state prison sentence as follows.  For the official misconduct a consecutive sentence of 5-10 years to run consecutive to the third degree theft of 3-5 years. Total maximum state prison exposure of 15-years in state prison.

Appropriate pre-trial motions filed to the Superior Court Judge and the official misconduct count of the indictment is dismissed by court prior to trial. 

After a five day criminal jury trial in which the case was given to the jury for deliberation, and while the jury is still deliberating, the Hudson County Prosecutor offers the defendant PTI (pre-trial intervention program), without the payment of any restitution.

Final results: After a period of one-year the theft charge will be dismissed and the Defendant will move to have his arrest for these charges expunged, and he will have absolutely no criminal record of the arrest or of the charges which were dismissed.

The Defendant who was not guilty is vindicated by Attorney Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., Esq. For a further review of the numerous criminal defense victories for Attorney Sanzone go to CriminalDefenseNJ.com

The Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., providing competent and vigorous criminal defense representation for 25-years in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Hudson, Essex, Union, Somerset, Bergen, Passaic, Monmouth, Ocean, Middlesex counties.

Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., Esq.
P.O. Box 261
277 North Broad Street
Elizabeth, N.J. 07207
(908) 354-7006



Ipse dixit, which is translated from Latin to English, “we already decided you are bad.”  Why do the police and/or prosecutor always decided that the defendant committed the crime without knowing all the facts of the case?  Willful blindness is never justice.  Authentic Justice requires that before anyone is charged with a crime that the charging authorities honestly and fairly investigate the alleged unlawful activity.  All too often law enforcement rushes to judgment “to put a feather in their cap” and close a file.

Friday, August 22, 2014

New Jersey Appellate Court Gives a Brake to Unlicensed New Jersey Drivers Caught Driving Without a Driver’s License.




On August 11, 2014, the New Jersey Appellate Division held in State v. Armando Carreon that any person convicted of being an unlicensed driver while driving can only be sentenced to a jail sentence or fine but not both.  This is good news for never licensed drivers because most municipal court judges will interested in getting a fine from the convicted motorist.  If so, the municipal court judge will not be foreclosed for also giving a custodial term sentence pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:3-10.
In this particular case which the appellate division reversed the sentence, because the defendant was a third time offender he was sentenced to a fine of $756.00, plus court costs, and a ten-day jail sentence.
For people who have been previously licensed to drive the statute states that the defendant will be either fined or custodial term, but not both, for violators who have previously been licensed to drive.
If you have been charged with a motor vehicle offense you should consult with an experienced New Jersey criminal defense attorneyhttp://www.criminaldefensenj.com to help optimize the chances of obtaining a favorable result for your case.
Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., Elizabeth, New Jersey, (908) 354-7006



Saturday, March 29, 2014

What NOT To Do When Being Pulled Over for a DWI Motor Vehicle Stop in New Jersey




Every motor vehicle stop by a police officer involving a motorist is unique based on facts of the case.  This blog is not meant to give specific legal advice to any motorist being pulled over by a police officer in New Jersey while driving his or her motor vehicle.  However, these general guidelines and tips might be helpful in most cases.

First, when you see or hear a siren or overhead lights from a vehicle you must immediately safely pull-over to the first safe shoulder to the right if possible.  Remember, use your right turn blinkers and come to an immediate stop.  Pull over close to the curb in a safe manner and remain in your vehicle.

Second, until approached by the police officer it is best to keep your hands in plain view, and do not stumble around for your driving credentials until after the officer approaches and asks you to produce same.

Third, when the officer approaches and asks you for your driving credentials, it is permissible to ask why you are being pulled over.  A police officer must notify why he is doing so, however, if he refused to tell you, do not push the issue and just give him your driver’s license, registration, and insurance card.  Also, be polite, answering “yes sir”, or “no madam”.  Even if you suspect that you are being profiled do not say this, because it will only make the officer take the offensive and start escalating the situation which will not be in your favor.

Fourth, although not every police department has motor vehicle recording tapes, or police body microphones, treat each encounter with the officer as if they are wearing a microphone and recording and videoing their encounter with you.  All New Jersey State Police stops are audio and video recorded with the trooper wearing a body microphone.  In any event whether or not such devices are being used politeness goes a long way.  If the officer is extremely nasty and aggressive you can bet he does not have those devices on.

Fifth, if the officer asks you whether you have had any alcoholic drinks before driving, you have no obligation to answer such a question, since everyone has a fifth amendment right to remain silent and that right is not eviscerated when you drive an automobile.  Keep in mind also that if you admit to having anything to drink, even one beer you will be asked to submit to psycho-physical field sobriety tests.  Likewise, you are under no obligation to tell him where you are coming from, if he asks, which he will.  You are under no obligation to tell him were you are going.  These are private confidential matters, and nobody, nobody, has a right to evade your privacy.  Of course, if you want to answer that is your choice, but normally, depending on the situation, you might want to remain silent and politely say, “Sorry but my privacy is important to me.”

Sixth, it is important that when you retrieve your driving credentials that you do so quickly, easily, without fumbling or dropping items on the floor.  Such behavior on the part of the motorist will be recorded by the officer as a sign of intoxication.

Seventh, if you are asked to step outside the vehicle, do so without hesitation.  However, if you are asked to perform any psycho-physical field sobriety tests, you have to make the prudential judgment as to whether you will perform such tests.  You have no obligation to comply.  If you are ill, injured, upset, confused, tried, you can refuse to take any field tests.  Note, however, if you refuse, most likely you will be placed under arrest for DWI.  Keep in mind however, that if you are asked to perform any tests, most likely, the officer has already made up his or her mind that you are a DWI and regardless as to how you perform on the tests, you will be nevertheless arrested.  I may experience I have since defendant’s perform almost perfect field sobriety tests on video and still be arrested.  In any event, the decision is yours and not the officers as to whether you will perform the tests.  If you do not perform said tests, such refusal will “not be normally” used against you.  In any event, if the matter goes to trial, and the breath readings are thrown out, the prosecutor will have no evidence to convict you on observations.  Remember, in New Jersey you can be convicted on both observations alone, and breath tests results.  If the breath tests are thrown out, and there is no field sobriety tests, you have a much better chance of an acquittal.  In the final analysis you have everything to lose and nothing to gain, by submitting to field tests, but of course, you must make that decision, based on your own unique situation.  Lastly, remember also that it is easier to beat one case than two cases, why give yourself another case, which is refusal.

Eighth, always, always, submit to the breath test, by law you must submit, and a refusal will result in an automatic loss of license for 7-months.  It is easier to beat a DWI than a refusal case.  Keep you options and chances of an acquittal by doing the tests.

Ninth, at the station, if not already done so when the cuffs were place on you, you will be given your Miranda Rights.  It is important once those rights are given, that you shut-up, keep quit, and say absolutely nothing.  The only thing that you are required to say, is I will submit to the breath test.

Tenth, consult and consider retaining the legal services of Attorney, Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., Esq., an experienced DWI/DUI attorney in New Jersey.

Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., Esq.
277 North Broad Street
P.O. Box 261
Elizabeth, N.J. 07207
(908) 354-7006

“Poems are made by fools like me, but only God can make a Tree.”  Joyce Kilmer

Friday, October 11, 2013

New Jersey Supreme Court Takes Step Backwards In Protection of the Accused Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel.




In State v. Miller, the New Jersey Supreme Court took a step backwards in defense of the accused right to effective assistance of counsel by affirming a conviction in which the public defender, on the day of trial, met the defendant-client.

The Supreme Court in a tortuous ruling held that because this was “a simple case”, for whatever that means, because no case in which the defendant is facing state prison sentence is simple, that it was not ineffective for the public defender not to have discussed the case prior to the trial date.  This decision is amazingly naive to the realities of a criminal trial.  How could a criminal defense attorney competently defend a defendant without knowing the facts of the case, as told by the defendant?  How would the attorney know which witnesses needed to be subpoaned?  How would the attorney know what strategy to use?  How would the attorney know what motions needed to be filed?  How would the attorney know anything about the client’s personal history, for example, possible affirmative defense, insanity, intoxication, self-defense, etc? 

In fact, this was not a simple case for the defendant because he was sentenced to 5-years in state prison after h is conviction.  In this decision, the Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s decision to move the trial calendar at the expense of the defendant’s constitutional rights guaranteed under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution.  Every defendant, rich or poor, is entitled to vigorous and competent legal representation.  This is a sad day for the rights of the accused in New Jersey.

Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr.www.criminaldefensenj.com
Elizabeth, New Jersey
(908) 354-7006

NJ Criminal Lawyer, NJ Criminal Defense Attorney, Jersey City Criminal Lawyers, Union County Criminal Lawyers, Essex County Criminal Lawyers, Hudson County Criminal Attorneys, Bayonne, Elizabeth, Hackensack, New Brunswick, Newark, Patterson, Morristown, Toms River, Freehold, Somerville, Passaic, East Orange, Orange, Irvington, Bayonne, Jersey City, Union City, North Bergen, Harrison, West Orange, Union, Clark

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Defending the Possession with Intent to Distribute Case In Superior Court-Hudson County, Jersey City, by Criminal Defense Attorney Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr.

www.criminaldefensenj.com
It is without argument that the majority of criminal cases on the docket in Superior Court, Hudson County are the controlled dangerous substance (CDS) offenses.  Even drug users who have quantities of over 10 to 20 dime bags are often charged with possession with intent to distribute, notwithstanding that they do not possess the narcotics for sale, but only for their own personal use.  Often these users face the draconian penalties as sellers when in fact they only possess the CDS for their own personal consumption.

Remember if you are convicted twice for such an offense, the second conviction will result in a mandatory extended term, increasing the offense level automatically from a third-degree to a second-degree, or a second-degree crime to a first-degree crime depending on the amount of CDS and whether it was recovered within 1000-feet of a school, or 500-feet of a public park or public building such as a library.

There are many ways to defend these types of case and often an expert is needed to refute the prosecutor’s police expert who will testify that based on his knowledge and the hypothetical question posed to him, that the defendant possessed the quantity of CDS not for possession but rather with intent to distribute. 

The police expert will use factors such as other packaging material, such as baggies found near the CDS, scales, cutting agents, large sums of money, as well as other facts which he will claim shows that the defendant possessed these drugs not for his personal use but with intent to distribute.  In most cases the defendant will need to refute this testimony with his own drug intent expert.  Accordingly, the defendant must retain his own intent expert to explain to the jury that possession of 15-bags of heroin for example is typical and highly standard for a person who has a drug habit of 5-10 bags per day, and that the sum of 15 or 20 bags, based on the defendant’s drug usage, will last him or her maybe two days.  The law office of Vincent Sanzone has handled hundreds of these types of charges, and has successfully worked with defense drug experts at trial in defending these cases.  If you are charged with such an offense in Superior Court, Hudson County you are urged to consult the Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr.

Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr., Esq.
(908) 354-7006
Elizabeth, N.J. 07207
Dated: October 10, 2013

Friday, August 9, 2013

IT IS TIME THAT PHONE COMPANIES STOP RIPPING OFF FAMILIES AND CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS THAT NEED TO COMMUNICATE WITH STATE PRISON INMATES BY TELEPHONE



August 9, 2013, Elizabeth, New Jersey


The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has finally decided to vote on a resolution after 10-years to stop phone companies such as Global Tel Link (GTL) from overcharging attorneys and inmates and their families for phone service from county and state prisons.  For years this company and others have been paying the prisons with kickbacks and other incentives for the privilege to rip off inmates who need to communicate with their criminal defense attorneys. 

By way of example a one-hour phone call can cost over $60.00, and collect calls even higher.  These phone companies have a captive audience and take full advantage of that fact.  It is cheaper for my clients to call Asia from the Union County Jail than to call my office six blocks away from the jail in Elizabeth.

Today the FCC will vote to cap these exorbitant fees and hopefully they will do more to monitor these companies from ripping off criminal defense attorneys, inmates and their families.

Thank you for acting FCC commissioner Mignon Clyburn for finally taking action to help protect our most vulnerable are incarcerated citizens.

“If you want peace work for justice.”  Pope John Paul, I

Law Office of Vincent J. Sanzone, Jr.
P.O. Box 261
277 North Broad Street
Elizabeth (Union County) New Jersey 07207
Office Phone Number (908) 354-7706
Cell Phone Number   (201) 240-5716