In another good
ruling the New Jersey Supreme Court has held that prosecutor’s cannot impeach a
defendant on cross-examine with their prior use of aliases.
The Court made this
ruling in the case State v. Parker which was decided last week. In Parker the defendant took the stand
and the prosecutor questioned him regarding his use of two different
names.
The State argued
that it could be used as extrinsic evidence to impeach the defendant under
evidence rule 607.
At trial the
prosecutor argued that the fact that the defendant used aliases showed that the
defendant’s testimony was false and that he was not innocent of the charges for
which he was on trial for.
The Supreme Court
rejected that argument, overturning the appellate division decision which
affirmed the conviction. The esteemed
Court held that the use of such evidence
is strictly prohibited under evidence rules 405(a) and 608.
The Court did
however rule that if the defendant had used aliases in connection with a crime
such as identity fraud or to evade prosecution than such prior use of aliases
might be admissible.
This is a good
ruling on many levels since many indictments will include a/k/a which put the
defendant in a bad light. Although many
judges will exclude such information when reading the indictment to the jury,
other judges do not. Further,many people are given aliases or "a/k/a" through no fault of their own, such as police mistakes, marriage, divorce, and errors in reporting through credit reporting agencies, etc.
P.O.
Box 261
277
North Broad Street
Elizabeth, N.J.
07207
(908) 354-7006
Elizabeth New
Jersey Criminal Law Defense Attorney, Union County Criminal Law Attorney, Essex
County Criminal Law Attorney, Hudson County Criminal Law Attorney,
Middlesex County Criminal Law Defense
Attorney
January 22, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment